Originally published at Reckonin.com.

It is natural and good that we revise our interpretations of past history now and then in the light of new evidence and the emergence of new perspectives on human affairs. But there seems to be going on at the moment a revisionism about World War II that is somewhat distorted in judging good and evil.

This new perspective is endemic in what is called the alternative right and is appearing even in more mainstream sources.  This view suggests that the Allies were mistaken and corrupt in destroying Nazi Germany and thereby inflicted a grave damage on Western civilization that is responsible for our present troubles.

I was shocked and disturbed when this view emerged in response to a little something I wrote on what claimed to be a Southern site.  I was attacked by numerous persons and ridiculed as a fool who did not understand history in my sympathy for Britain over Nazis.  I have been  defending the South for half a century.  I thought I deserved a little respect on a “Southern” site. These were people claiming to be Southern.  They are people afraid to use their real names.  They differ in content but are similar in character to the horde of shallow leftist pseudo-intellectuals destroying civilised understanding by their distortions of history.

There are some elements in the Yankee national character that hint of fascism, but it is impossible to imagine anything more alien to the Southern tradition than goose-stepping Garman aggressors.

It is true that World War II turned out badly.  It weakened the British, French, and Dutch empires, allowing Communism and chaos across Asia, and it gave much of Europe to the Soviet Union.  But what happened later does not invalidate war against the Nazis. History often plays tricks like this.

According to our new revisionists, Hitler was a nice idealist who did not want to make war on Britain (as long as they agreed with him) and was only trying to save Europe from Communism.  Britain declared war on him anyway.  We are given pictures of a fat, corrupt, Jewish-controlled Churchill as responsible for starting World War II.

This is to misunderstand the situation of 1939 entirely.  It had long been a standing principle that no one power should be allowed to dominate Europe.  Hitler had already conquered and occupied much territory.  The invasion of Poland against his own promise indicated a lasting threat.  It is true that Britain and France could not help Poland and that they did not declare against the Soviet Union for taking part of that overrun country.  But  declaring war might deter Hitler from further invasions and the Soviets were not an immediate threat to Western Europe.

The Western powers were by no means perfect.  There is no perfection among humans.  But compared to the aggressive Nazi police state they were models of decent behaviour and constitutional government.   It is true that the war damaged Britain, perhaps irrecoverably, but World War II was still their “finest hour,” deserving lasting admiration.

It is true that the Allies engaged in terror bombing of civilians, but the Germans started it.

And what about this resurrected Hitler? He created a police state that weighed heavily on his people, curtailing their freedom and demanding  extreme and endless sacrifice, though being Germans many of them liked it.

Military genius he thought himself to be. He had some early successes due to the hesitancy of the Western powers to get into war again. But thinking he could conquer Russia in a few weeks–one of the stupidest delusions in the history of the world.  He never understood Britain or Russia. Like all bad people he thought others had the same motivations as he did.

He continually overruled able and patriotic generals who understood his mistakes.  In the latter stages of the war he was a weakened drug addict ready to sacrifice his people to the last man, woman, and child because they had failed his divine mission.  And hiding in a bunker and escaping the consequences of his actions as his country collapsed. Some patriot!  We cannot imagine such behaviour by Churchill or DeGaule.

The Germans should have overthrown the destroyer of their country by 1944, but they were too used to following orders and thinking of themselves as superior.

The views expressed at AbbevilleInstitute.org are not necessarily those of the Abbeville Institute. 


Clyde Wilson

Clyde Wilson is a distinguished Professor Emeritus of History at the University of South Carolina where he was the editor of the multivolume The Papers of John C. Calhoun. He is the M.E. Bradford Distinguished Chair at the Abbeville Institute. He is the author or editor of over thirty books and published over 600 articles, essays and reviews and is co-publisher of www.shotwellpublishing.com, a source  for unreconstructed Southern books.

19 Comments

  • William Quinton Platt III says:

    There were 6 communist republics declared in Germany between the wars with Bavaria being the largest of such. Of course, the Germans bear much blame as they returned Lenin to Russia to bring about that revolution.

    The Polish Corridor was the proximal cause of WW2. That insane decision sealed the fate of another war.

    Churchill was a politician and you can’t say what he would have done in a similar situation. The bombing of Britain was no comparison to the armies advancing on Berlin.

    Finally, the Haavara Agreement casts an entirely different light on the domestic front.

  • Paul Yarbrough says:

    “But thinking he could conquer Russia in a few weeks–one of the stupidest delusions in the history of the world.”
    It was at this point (instead of 4 years later) that German officers should have entertained the idea of planting a bomb under the table.

  • scott thompson says:

    why is this article on abbevile?

    • Brion McClanahn says:

      Because Clyde Wilson is a board member and has carte blanche in publishing on the website. He asked to have it posted.

  • Dr Wilson,

    I am one of your biggest fans and have read most of your books and articles, but I must disagree with you about WW II. I am not a Nazi or socialist or a big fan of Hitler, but you must read Mike Walsh’s Witness to History and David Irving’s books, Churchill’s War and Hitler’s war. They may expose you to some history that has been erased and censored. You are a widely respected and admired historian, so have a look at these books and write what you think about them.

  • Thomas Brittingham says:

    I would suggest reading Patrick Buchanan’s “Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War” for greater clarity on this topic. Or for a more detailed understanding, David Irving’s books “Hitler’s War” and “Churchill’s War”.

    Western Europe was absolutely under the threat of communism. The Soviets were on the ground during the Spanish Civil War. Look into that conflict for a better understanding of what motivated the hundreds of thousands of foreign volunteers to fight under German command. SS Charlemagne, made up of Frenchman, were the last defenders of Berlin.

    WW2 was a tragedy of geopolitical circumstance that resulted in the destruction of the West as we know it. Communism and all of its reprehensible traits could’ve been destroyed in 1941, had FDR and Churchill not decided to back the USSR, which already had tens of millions of victims and multiple democratic countries invaded before their war with Germany.

  • Barbara Cornett says:

    Which would I prefer, for a man like Hitler to rule and have enormous control and influence or for the international Jew to have that control and influence. We can see what a world run by Jews is like because they have destroyed the west. They literally liquidated our economy in China. The create our money and decide who gets elected in Washington DC and our politicians literally must swear allegiance to Israel in order to get elected to anything. We are now watching the genocide of Palestinians in Palestine. Is that the “American way? Or what’s best for the Jew? When your country becomes as low as this country has gotten I don’t see how you have any room to attack Hitler? We’re genociding people and giving Israel money and weapons and Trump could stop the war any time he chooses but he doesn’t represent us he represents Jewish interests or he never would have made it to the White House.

    Where is any evidence that the people in the west will be treated any differently? Has the federal government not attempted to kill as many Americans as possible with Covid? Robert Kennedy has stated that he believes that neither Jews nor the Chinese ever took the covid vaccine. I agree with him. Hitler wouldn’t allow the Jews to do these things. Hitler was right.

  • “It had long been a standing principle that no one power should be allowed to dominate Europe.”

    The statement above is taken completely out of context. It, in fact, relates directly to the British Empire’s “balance of power doctrine”, which is on of the major factors that led Britain to declare war on Germany and was in force by WWII for several centuries in British imperial politics.

    That being said, I believe Professor Wilson should stick with Southern History, as he appears to be merely repeating the well worn propaganda that the West has cultivated for years. The fact that he finds right-wing promoters of a more refined history of WWII doesn’t make them wrong. However, most right-winged people in their beliefs are relatively infantile in how they promote them.

    Nonetheless, to understand this, one has to read the actual diplomatic histories of the Inter-War Period, which I have. To date, I have read approximately 10 books on this subject. And all of them demonstrate that Adolf Hitler and Germany were attacked for the German invasion of Poland, which, one, Poland had been provoking since 1936, and two, was done after months of failed negotiations to have Poland stop the violent repressions against the German minorities there.

    The definitive study on this subject to date is David Hoggan’s, “The Forced War”, which details the entire Inter-War Period and Germany’s attempts to maintain the peace. None of this, of course, will placate those who refuse to take such studies into consideration. However, these are serious books written by people who have done their research.

    In short, none of the Allies during WWII were honest or noble in their pursuits. I suggest that Professor Wilson read Professor Sean McMeekin’s, “Stalin’s War”, to get a better perspective on all this.

  • James Persons says:

    Head slap, hokey smokes and ay caramba! I am amazed at how many WWII esoteric historians read this site. I am also amazed at how agitated they get over people who accept the conventional history of WWII. So what? The Yanks have most of America brainwashed, don’t they? Get some perspective! Face it people, Hitler was a bad guy, Stalin was too and FDR and Churchill weren’t so hot either, but not as bad as Adolf and Joe. Socialism, fascism and communism are BAD. I’ve been thinking this site was about the South, our traditions, and exposing the Righteous Cause myth. IMHO the only BAD guy that should be addressed on this site is Abe. and some of his cohorts. It sure would be preferable though to come here and read about the South and not Eurotrash, but feel free to spout off folks. I have defended your right to shoot your mouths off since I volunteered to go to Vietnam and will continue to do so. Now, I’m off to suck on my pacifier – after dipping it in some very good bourbon.

    • James Persons says:

      PS: Dr. Wilson can write about any darn thing he wishes IMHO because without him this site would not exist, and I love this site.

    • Matt C says:

      “…the only BAD guy that should be addressed…is Abe…”

      Need to go back even further, to John Locke:

      “Patriot pamphlets and sermons primarily appealed to theory, fear, and JOHN LOCKE.” Gregg Frazer

      And, Thomas Paine:

      “I know not whether any man in the world has had more influence on its inhabitants or affairs for the last thirty years than Thomas Paine.” John Adams

      “We have it in our power to begin the world over again,” Thomas Paine
      Yes, sure Tom. That about says it all.

      “The Loyalist ministers believed that virtually every biblical, legal, and rational argument was on their side and that the Patriots had to resort to intimidation and violence against defenseless civilians in order to achieve their desired results. In their view, the Patriots expended tremendous effort to silence their opposition because they could not win an open argument.”

      Yes.

    • THT says:

      You are right. Lincoln is the common denominator it reduces to.

  • Douglas L. Yarbrough says:

    If they are the “Southerners” I am thinking of, I’m sure the word “skype” appeared here and there as a code word for “Jews” followed by rants about everything wrong under the sun being a conspiracy by said vague people. Even antebellum Southern Jews “were not to be trusted”, according to these people.
    I got booted a few years ago on one of their pages for consistently not seeing eye to eye with them on WW2 and such yet never resorting to personal attacks or political name calling. I even got accused of being brainwashed by “the skypes”. Sadly, some of these people claimed to be Christian and even used to be active in Souther heritage and culture.
    These people are obsessed and are not doing it for God or The South anymore.
    There is room for discussion and debate regarding WW2, communism, nazism, the French and British policy, etc. but these people are almost as bad as any Yankee or Marxist in their view of history and they way they engage those that dissent

  • J B says:

    Well said. I sometimes wonder if these folks fall for the same trap German conservatives did: “better the Nazis than the Communists” is a shallow, ultimately self-defeating point. Both believe in a centralized nation-state above all else and have very little regard for the individual, and so are equally threatening to a conservatism founded on natural law. Rendering unto Caesar is a pretty clear command – the state should fulfill it’s purposes, and nothing else.

  • Craig Giddens says:

    Recommended reading.

    The Costs of War: America’s Pyrrhic Victories
    John Denson

    A Century of War: Lincoln, Wilson and Roosevelt
    John Denson

    Great Wars and Great Leaders: A Libertarian Rebuttal
    Ralph Raico

    • Craig Giddens says:

      Also –

      World War I: The Rest of the Story and How It Affects You Today
      Richard J. Maybury

      World War II: The Rest of the Story and How It Affects You Today
      Richard J. Maybury

Leave a Reply to Barbara Cornett Cancel Reply