History is the propaganda of the victorious.
– Voltaire
The ubiquitous claim that the so-called “Civil War” (which it was not), was “about” slavery (which it was not), and the “righteous” North went to war against the “traitorous” South to free the slaves (which it did not) is the most bald-faced lie of American history, and, as Thomas Carlyle stated in his Latter-day Pamphlets (IV – The New Downing Street) all lies are cursed and damned from the beginning.
“Civil Wars” are waged among factions struggling for control of the government in question. The Southern States did not want to control the United States government, they only wanted to peacefully withdraw from it and form their own – sanctioned by the Declaration of Independence, which states “[W]hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security…” The various southern States, in their various Ordinances of Secession – ratified by the same sovereign State Conventions that had earlier ratified their respective accession to the Union – delineated their various complaints and many stated reasons for their peaceful secession from that Union. Virginia, the “Mother of States and of Statesmen,” remained firmly loyal to the Union she had sacrificed so much to create. But when Abraham Lincoln called for troops to subjugate the seceded States and drive them back into the Union, Virginia refused, and told the Lincoln government “You have chosen to inaugurate civil war, and we will meet it in the same spirit that you have exhibited towards the South.” “YOU,” Abraham Lincoln, have chosen to inaugurate the bloodiest war in the history of the Western Hemisphere.
Treason? The South did not commit treason defending herself from Lincoln’s war of invasion, conquest, and coerced political allegiance. Abraham Lincoln committed treason for waging war against them. Abraham Lincoln did not recognize the southern States as being out of the Union, and therefore committed treason by his own definition by invading them according to Article III, Section 3 of the US Constitution, which states that “Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them…” Lincoln provoked the firing on Ft. Sumter in 1861 just as King George III provoked Massachusetts at Lexington and Concord in 1775, and Lincoln got the war he wanted.
Slavery? The war was not “about” slavery. Abraham Lincoln said so himself in his First Inaugural Address. He said he only wanted to “save the Union and collect the revenue” – that is, “save the Union” in order to collect the Southern tariff revenue for the benefit of the North. Furthermore, cotton was “king” in those days, but with the South’s “Cotton Kingdom” out of the Union and free trading with Europe, the North’s “Mercantile Kingdom” would collapse. Lincoln didn’t go to war to free any slaves. Lincoln went to war to drive the “Cotton Kingdom” back into the Union at the point of the bayonet. That is what the war was “about.” Slavery was just the smelly “red herring” covering his tracks in the “Myth of the Righteous Cause.”
Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation was strictly a desperate war measure issued to keep Europe from recognizing the Confederacy and lifting the Union blockade when the South was about to win her independence. It only claimed to free the slaves behind Confederate lines. Otherwise, it plainly stated that slavery was just fine with “The Great Emancipator” as long as one were loyal to his government, proven six months later when he admitted West Virginia, a “slave State,” into the Union – and proven by the fact that slavery was Constitutional in the United States of America until the ratification of the Thirteenth Amendment in December of 1865, after Lincoln and the Southern Confederacy both were in their graves.
The North did not “go to war to free the slaves,” for she did not even free her own until after it was over. But even then she merely replaced chattel slavery with the far more discrete and far more profitable “debt slavery,” and merely replaced “Ole Marster” with a Wall Street banker – who has enslaved us all, and all of our unborn generations of children, with the servicing of a forty trillion dollar National Debt that will never be repaid.
“The Myth of the Righteous Cause” is nothing more than pure and unadulterated “Presentism,” which is, by definition, history twisted to conform to a political agenda, and which is, by definition, a lie. Follow the Yankee dollar and know the Truth.
The views expressed at AbbevilleInstitute.org are not necessarily those of the Abbeville Institute.






I once thought as you do, that it was not a “civil war”…I was wrong and so are you. The “civil war” was the act of replacing a REPUBLIC OF SOVEREIGN STATES with a NATION.
US military officers from 1830 until 1862 swore to defend the US and protect THEM from THEIR enemies…just as you describe where the CONSTITUTION refers to the US in the PLURAL with regards to TREASON.
When the first idiot lieutenant in the first merc unit to swear allegiance to the CONSTITUTION under the IRONCLAD OATH puked up those words (invalidating the oaths of all previous yankee officer mercs), the REPUBLIC was transformed in a “civil war”…all that remained was to discover if the Southern REPUBLIC was going to be forced back into the new NATION.
I will suggest…nay…I will INSIST upon my elected representatives that ai agents CANNOT PROFESS OPINION to the volk. Ai agents must only be allowed to place FACTS in front of the people. You have placed FACTS in front of the people. Please continue to do so and never be afraid to change any of your conclusions based upon these FACTS. The woke base their conclusions upon the opinions of other woke propagandists. We must be better…we must seek truth and as my old Dad insisted…THE TRUTH WILL OUT.
History is the propaganda of the victorious.
– Voltaire
Propaganda is the history of the coward.
–Paul Y.
Maybe some Abbeville stalwarts can help me with the perennial question:
“Anyone wanting to know why the Southern states started the Civil War need only to read the succession documents.”
I know the answers. They demand context. How to answer in as few words, given disinterest and challenged attention spans of their fellow travelers ?
DISCLAIMER: I know it’s “secession”. The frequent alternate spelling often accompanies the story to follow of Fort Sumpter.
Only four States mentioned slavery as the reason for departing. Sumter had been previously fired upon when Star of the West attempted resupply…firing on a fort doesn’t start a war just as firing on a ship doesn’t cause a war.
Fedgov is supposed to prevent invasion. Fedgov failed to protect Virginia from invasion. Fedgov did not pursue co-conspirators who fled the US. Northern States shielded brown’s co-conspirators from arrest. Slavery was an economic system which supplied cheap cotton to northern mills. The north could care less about slaves…but the north did not want slavery to expand because if slavery expanded, slave States could prevent northern-controlled House bills from soaking the South through a balanced Senate. Once California entered the union as free (which it should not have done because half of California is south of the Missouri Compromise northern limit of slavery) the Senate balance was lost forever. The South trusted the north to enforce Fugitive Slave Acts passed to compensate the South for allowing California to enter as free but northern Personal Liberty Laws were passed to counter this compromise.
Slavery was a blessing for US blacks. That’s the real story here. No “back to Africa” movement was successful. Stone Agers were brought out of a miserable hexx-hole and slaves who had been destined for the stewpot got a second lease on life.
I mean, yeah, but “How to answer in as few words?”
They say, Secession document says slavery – SLAVERY!!! The unwitting audience says, Yes, I see.
They aren’t waiting for historical chain of events, context, and northern treachery.
It’s a problem.
The narrative has been controlled for thousands of years. We are the first generation to be given a world-wide printing press. Embrace the struggle. Trust me when I say, I’ve never been happier. The controllers gave up their monopoly on the message for a few eyeball “likes”. This is quite possibly the worst use of an inheritance since the Proverbial bowl of soup.
Start at the beginning…SLAVERY WAS A BLESSING FOR THOSE BLACKS FORTUNATE ENOUGH TO ARRIVE IN THE BRITISH NEW WORLD COLONIES. When you see history with this fact firmly fixed, you will not fall for the propaganda of the controllers. Everything you think you know about history is a lie, with few exceptions. Focus on those few exceptions. Focus on the facts.
FACT…there would have been no possible trans-Atlantic slave trade without the eager participation of African nations.
FACT…slavery was a blessing for blacks in the US. Every back-to-Africa movement collapsed before it even began.
FACT…the financing for the slave trade was made possible by European and northern banks.
FACT…the entirety of the slave ships were built in Europe or New England.
FACT…there were over 250,000 free blacks in the South prior to the war…this number is greater than the number of free blacks in the north (220,000). Even if free blacks wanted to migrate north, they weren’t allowed to do so because the NORTH created Jim Crow laws to keep blacks in the South.
FACT…it was yankees who insisted slaves were only worth 3/5ths of a vote.
FACT…it was yankee shipping interests who extended the trans-Atlantic slave trade for 20 years after the Constitution was adopted.
FACT…these same yankee shipping interests shipped slaves for decades AFTER the 1808 ban on US ports went into effect.
FACT…the vast majority of slave families were the God-blessed nuclear family design.
FACT…the vast majority of pre-integration black families were the God-blessed nuclear family design.
FACT…it was only AFTER integration the black family and community were destroyed. Black families THRIVED under slavery and segregation WHICH WAS PROVIDED BY WHITE SOUTHERN MALES.
FACT…slaves were so well-treated between 1810 and 1860 (after importation of slaves was prohibited) their population mirrored the White native population…both of these populations DOUBLED…BOTH GREW AT THE SAME RATE.
I could go on and on…you’re not going to be able to end Stockholm Syndrome with a few sound bites…but I guarantee you this…tens of millions of ignorant people have been enlightened over the past decade. The genie is out of the bottle.
I’m not going to add footnotes to document these facts. The adoption of ai enables even the most casual observer to find these facts…despite the preponderance of OPINION obscuring these TRUTHS. This preponderance of data is the only veil of smoke left for the controllers of the narrative to hide behind. Ai will tend to migrate toward the official narrative…but if you press ai, it will provide you with actual proof of all these FACTS.
It is always interesting to read what W.Q. Platt III has to say.
But, as an unimportant aside of which many commentators should take note:-
I believe what you mean is: ‘ I couldn’t care less.’ Meaning its importance to me is absolute zero.
‘I could care less’ would mean it is indeed of some interest to me.
I mention this because I know Abbeville readers and authors revere accuracy of thought and speech,
There were a few dozen abolitionists who cared…so the north could have cared less…but there were abolitionists in the South as well. Always the most important and accurate distinction on the “slavery” issue is the fact most northerners despised blacks in general and slaves in particular and absolutely did not want to compete with either for jobs. The most fortunate blacks who have ever existed were the ancestors of modern US blacks who were spared the soup pot and caught a ride to the New World and out of the Stone Age.
I can’t seem to find the edit button on this site…or I’d follow your suggestion and change the wording in most of my posts to make my scribblings more easily understood…
Sumter. Named after Thomas Sumter, a Revolutionary War Hero.
Perhaps the term that would more accurately denote the War relative to the northern perspective is “The Self-Righteous War.” Not that they themselves would ever think to refer to it in way.
northern / union states were ok with this ““[W]hen a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new guards for their future security…” but somehow their ‘complexion had changed’ to not allow the south to leave? or is war what the desired to leave all along…freaky Northern Union 48er bar club meeting discussions??